Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Supporting the York Aquinas Reading Group (and anyone else!) as it wends its weary way through the summa theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas
Introductory Material
Useful External Links
- Alfred Freddoso's Translation
- The "Old" English Dominican Translation
- Aquinas in Latin
- Thomas Aquinas in English
- English Translations of Aquinas
- Farrell's Companion to the Summa
- English Dominican Province
- English Lay Dominicans
- Godzdogz
- Prayer Before Study
- The "Twenty-Four Theses"
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The First Part of the Summa - The One God
- Question 1
- Question 2
- Question 3
- Question 4
- Question 5
- Question 6
- Question 7
- Question 8
- Question 9
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 14 - Texts
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
The First Part of the Summa - The Blessed Trinity
The First Part of the Summa - Creation
The First Part of the Summa - The Angels
The First Part of the Summa - The Hexaemeron
The First Part of the Summa - Human Nature
- Question 75
- Question 76
- Question 77
- Question 78
- Question 79
- Question 80
- Question 81
- Question 82
- Question 83
- Question 84
- Question 85
- Question 86
- Question 87
- Question 88
- Question 89
- Question 90
- Question 91
- Question 92
- Question 93
- Question 94
- Question 95
- Question 96
- Question 97
- Question 98
- Question 99
- Question 100
- Question 101
- Question 102
Followers
Contributors
Thanks for linking to this lecture! Another couple of good books in which Davies expands on many of the themes related in this lecture are:
ReplyDeleteBrian Davies, “An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion”, Oxford University Press.
Brian Davies, “The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil”, Continuum.
I must admit that the most worrying thing that I find about the so-called New Atheists is their anti-rationality. The philosophical arguments that they present are transparently incorrect, and many philosophers (theistic and non-theistic alike) have demolished their positions. Their whole approach seems to be that of appealing to the basest instincts amongst their audience. Perhaps they should be labelled the “new barbarism”…